Product owner
Defines the user outcome, business rules, priorities, and what a successful result looks like.
MCP & CHATGPT APP DEVELOPMENT PROCESS
A fixed-scope process with an early working slice, written acceptance criteria, production testing, and complete handover.
HOW THE BUILD MOVES
Stage outcome
We define the user, request, desired result, systems, access model, action boundaries, and feasibility risks. If the workflow is too broad or depends on unavailable data, it is narrowed before the project is quoted.
You receive
Approve what will and will not be built.
Stage outcome
We connect one representative request through the integration to the source system and back. Your team reviews the working behavior before the remaining tools and interface states are completed.
You receive
Confirm the useful path before the build expands.
Stage outcome
We finish the remaining tools, account connection, permission checks, safe writes, structured results, optional interface, failure behavior, and logs included in scope. Then we run the agreed evaluation scenarios.
You receive
Confirm that the written acceptance scenarios pass.
Stage outcome
We deploy to the agreed client-controlled environment, verify the production path, and transfer the project assets. The responsible team is walked through configuration, operation, logs, rollback, and future changes.
You receive
Accept the build against the written scope.
MORE THAN A HAPPY-PATH DEMO
Direct requests, natural or indirect phrasing, similar requests that are out of scope, and cases where no tool should run.
Missing or invalid information, unauthorized requests, incorrect scopes, and cross-tenant access attempts.
Read, draft, and committed writes, plus confirmation, cancellation, duplicate requests, and partial-action cases.
Empty results, timeouts, upstream failures, retry behavior, and workflows with or without an optional interface.
The agreed scenarios become repeatable evaluation cases that are included in the handover.
CLIENT PARTICIPATION
Defines the user outcome, business rules, priorities, and what a successful result looks like.
Explains the source systems, identity model, integration constraints, environments, and operational requirements.
Provides the documentation, test environment, representative data, and credentials required for the approved stage of work.
Reviews the scope, working slice, acceptance results, and production handover at the agreed gates.
Production credentials are not needed for the first conversation.
DEPLOYMENT AND HANDOVER
Source repository plus the MCP server, ChatGPT app package, skills, interface, schemas, or other assets included in scope.
Infrastructure setup, environment requirements, dependency files, secrets inventory, and production configuration.
Automated tests, evaluation fixtures, logs guidance, known limitations, rollback steps, and operational runbook.
Architecture and data-flow documentation plus a live or recorded technical handover for the responsible team.
PROCESS FAQ
Scope, timing, acceptance, and ownership before work begins.
We review the user workflow, source systems, access requirements, action risks, and desired result. When the project is a fit, the next step is a focused workflow and technical review that gives us enough information to prepare the written proposal.
No mandatory subscription is attached to a Studio build. Each engagement is quoted as a one-off project. Hosting, maintenance, or continued development can be scoped separately when the client wants them.
Pricing is set after the workflow and technical dependencies are reviewed. The proposal states the one-off fee, stages, assumptions, exclusions, client responsibilities, deliverables, and acceptance criteria before development begins.
The timeline depends on workflow breadth, source-system readiness, authentication, write actions, interface requirements, evaluation depth, deployment, and client review availability. The delivery sequence and target timing are included in the proposal rather than estimated from a generic tool count.
We can review and map the intended workflow, but a production integration still needs a reliable path to the required data and actions. Missing backend capability is identified early, then the workflow is narrowed or the additional backend work is scoped separately.
During the working-slice stage. One representative request is connected from the user interaction to the source system and back before the remaining surface is completed.
Acceptance is based on the written scope and agreed scenarios. It is not a general promise that every possible prompt, future platform change, or untested client behavior is covered.
KNWN records the failure, determines whether it is a defect, dependency problem, missing requirement, or known limitation, and completes the fixes included in scope before acceptance. Material changes outside the agreed scope are reviewed separately.
Yes. Maintenance, operational support, or new functionality can be scoped separately. It is not required for the client to own or operate the delivered implementation.
A product owner, a technical owner, access to the approved systems or test environments, clarification of business rules, and timely decisions at the agreed review gates.
START WITH ONE VALUABLE WORKFLOW
Tell us who needs it, what they should be able to accomplish, which systems are involved, and which actions require approval. We will tell you whether it is a fit and what the first build should include.
No production credentials are needed for the first conversation.